download movies best free download movies ang cheap cigarettes very nice

January 09, 2004

Old Skool

It's probably a clue that you're drinking too much when the people in the local off licence (US: liquor store) greet you like an old friend and reward your faithful custom with little gifts of candy. God knows how this tradition began -- I blame Ian -- but these days nearly every wine purchase is accompanied by some little sweet tidbit or other.

Case in point: the astonishingly old school wafer biscuit whose wrapper is pictured above. I somehow believed that they didn't make 'em like that anymore, but evidently I was wrong.

Looking at this scrap of 1940s styling, I imagine T. Tunnock of Uddingston as a dour, octagenarian Scot fighting a losing battle against the modern confectionery industry. His upstart grandchildren have tried to get him to move on to modern plastic wrappings in bright primary colours, but he's having none of it. "Ye'll bring in that new-fangled shite over ma deid body!" he cries, standing shakily at the bakery gates brandishing his claymore.

Which is no doubt what they want us to think. More likely Tunnock's is just another tentacle of Nestlé.

Anyway, let me draw your attention to the following factoid on the label: "More than 4,000,000 of these biscuits made and sold every week." How many? Where the fuck do they all go? At "Net 26.5g" each, that's over 100 tonnes of biscuits. Just imagine the oven capacity required to bake the bloody things, let alone the vats of chocolate to coat them and the acreage of red-and-gold foil paper wrapping. And this, by the standards of the food industry, is a small scale operation.

Humans are notoriously bad at comprehending big numbers. We have no sense of proportion. But every now and then it's possible to snatch a tiny glimpse of the size of things, and it's enough to give you vertigo.

I mean, you might think it's a long way down the street to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space. Listen...

I feel quite faint after that. I think I'd better have another caramel biscuit to settle my stomach.
Posted by matt at January 9, 2004 12:36 PM

Comments

We all know the hazards of having a sense of proportion.

I suspect that if you scratch at the foil side of the label the original Nestlé wrapping will be revealed.

Posted by: Shyboy at January 9, 2004 01:26 PM

Amusing post, but the Douglas Adams reference is what got me. Nice. Joe

Posted by: joe at January 9, 2004 03:03 PM

Well, I think I've exercised admirable restraint in that I've only just decided to see what lurks behind your domain. I was picturing all sorts of depraved, yet alluring content.

But a blog? 'Tis worse than I feared...

[ontopic]
Last time I went to my local offy before xmas, somebody put a handful of sweets in my booze bag. I only noticed when I got home. I dumped them out on the two-foot high rubbish bin that passes as my 'table', and I've been eyeing them suspiciously ever since. Definitely poisoned. Don't like sweets anyway.
[/ontopic]

Anyway, I'll fuck off and leave you alone now. Here, I mean. The whining will obviously continue at work.

Posted by: atym at January 9, 2004 09:44 PM

I'd just like to point out that while providing our US English-speaking friends with an alternative version of a word is perfectly acceptable (off-licence/liquor store), I feel that the line has to be drawn at the adoption of US spelling.

The word 'tidbit' is a US version of the English word 'titbit', which was toned down on the other side of the Atlantic, to remove the potential salaciousness of the word 'tit' being included in a compound.

Heaven only knows what they would make of Scunthorpe.

Posted by: Eurodan at January 10, 2004 12:18 PM

[Dan] Oh, the shame. Of course, now I can't just silently correct it, so I guess we're stuck with the present spelling.

[Antonia] Oh, the shame. There is actually some alluring depravity hidden away here, but it would take more effort than it's worth to actually sift it out from the day to day banality.

Posted by: matt at January 10, 2004 05:10 PM

Did you know it would take 267 million, 632 thousand, 6 hundred and 40 Tunnocks CARAMEL wrappers to cover the British Isles......
Haven't got time to do the math for the earth...
Where do all the wrappers go !!

Posted by: Simon at April 5, 2005 01:41 PM

Comments for this post are now closed, but feel free to email me if you have something interesting to say.